Nepotism Under Trump: A Renewed Challenge to US Democracy

Donald Trump’s return to the White House as the 47th President of the United States once again raises the contentious issue of nepotism in the US government. During his first term from 2017 to 2021, Trump caused significant controversy by appointing family members to key positions. Current speculations suggest that he might continue and even intensify this controversial course in his second term.

Trump’s Family Appointment Policy: A Look Back and Forward

In his first presidency, Trump appointed his daughter Ivanka Trump and his son-in-law Jared Kushner as senior advisors in the White House. These appointments were widely criticized as neither Ivanka nor Jared had relevant government experience or appropriate qualifications. Their main qualification seemed to be solely their close family relationship with the President.For his upcoming second term, there are strong indications that Trump will again rely heavily on family members:

Donald Trump Jr. (46), the President’s eldest son, has gained considerable political influence in recent years and could play a central role in the new administration.
Lara Trump, Eric Trump’s wife, has already been appointed co-chair of the Republican National Committee, which is seen as a clear signal of her future involvement in government work.
Eric Trump himself is also being touted as a potential candidate for a high-ranking position.

The Anti-Nepotism Act of 1967: Origin and Current Relevance

The Anti-Nepotism Act, also known as the Bobby Kennedy Law, was passed in 1967 as a direct response to the appointment of Robert F. Kennedy as Attorney General by his brother, President John F. Kennedy. The law was originally intended to prevent government officials from appointing relatives to positions over which they have authority.The core wording of the law states: “A public official may not appoint, employ, promote, advance, or advocate for appointment, employment, promotion or advancement, in or to a civilian position in the agency in which he is serving or over which he exercises jurisdiction or control any individual who is a relative of the public official.”

Legal Effectiveness and Circumvention of the Law

Despite the Anti-Nepotism Act, Trump managed to appoint family members to key positions in his first term. This was possible due to a clever exploitation of a legal loophole:

The law uses the term “agency” in reference to government administration.
According to a controversial interpretation, the White House does not fall under this term.

This interpretation allowed Trump to hire family members as advisors in the White House, even if he couldn’t appoint them as cabinet members. This interpretation was confirmed by the Department of Justice in 2017 when it declared that Jared Kushner’s appointment did not violate the Anti-Nepotism Act.

Impacts and Criticism: A Threat to Democracy?

The practice of appointing family members to high government offices is critically viewed for several serious reasons:

Undermining democratic norms: It can be perceived as a clear preference for family ties over qualifications and competence, which undermines trust in government institutions.
Conflicts of interest: Family members in positions of power might be tempted to use their positions to promote personal or business interests, jeopardizing the integrity of government work.
Lack of accountability: Family members may be less inclined to contradict or moderate the President, which can lead to a dangerous concentration of power.
Weakening institutional controls: The presence of family members in key positions could limit the ability of other government officials to provide independent and critical advice, undermining the checks and balances of the political system.

Conclusion: A Challenge to American Democracy

The possible renewed and increased appointment of family members to important government positions by Donald Trump poses a serious challenge to the fundamental principles of American democracy. Although the Anti-Nepotism Act of 1967 was supposed to prevent such practices, legal interpretations and loopholes have made it possible to circumvent the law and undermine its spirit.The debate about nepotism in the US government will undoubtedly intensify in the coming years, as it raises fundamental questions about competence, conflicts of interest, and the integrity of democratic institutions. It is now up to the voters, Congress, and the courts to critically assess the appropriateness and far-reaching implications of such appointments and, if necessary, take decisive measures to protect and strengthen democratic principles.The future of American democracy may depend on how this challenge is addressed and whether a balance between presidential authority and democratic accountability can be restored.

Sources: